NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details

[JerseySuave4]

i wouldnt mind the generic FCS teams so much if maybe the uniforms changed so that if you play FCS East with Rutgers and then in the same week play FCS East with WVU, you dont feel like your playing the same team. And if they could make the FCS teams a tad better, not much since they arent supposed to be as good as FBS teams but they shouldnt have RBs that are as slow as my linemen just because they're an FCS team, it would make an upset more possible every now and then.

[GatorBait06NC]

hmmm... so still no word on whether or not SEC scheduling was fixed?

[GigemAGGIES13]

Most of that info is really great.

I'm still a bit worried about whether they are going to go overboard with the Program Prestige Player Progression.

[callmetaternuts]

Looking forward to the improvements. The scheduling and stuff is ncie, but more or less expected. Be interested to see all the changes inr atings, recruiting and just knowing the CPU wont recruit like a complete dip is awesome.

[countryboy]

I have a question. Will non-conference yearly rival games automatically be locked into the schedule or will we still have to schedule them ourselves?

Ex: Georgia/Georgia Tech, Louisville/Kentucky...etc..

[countryboy]

forgot to mention....like what I read in this blog. Now lets hope that speed progression doesn't get too out of hand.

[Jistic]

Great blog, it's all about Dynasty for me and a lot of players.

[rudyjuly2]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

I'm in year 2012 of a dynasty right now.

Damn you OMT!! You are in year 2012 already of NCAA 10?! C'mon! Spill some details of your dynasty and don't be afraid to let some gameplay comparisons to '09 accidentally spill out.

I really liked this blog. Maybe the best blog yet for NCAA. I'm an offline dynasty guy only so this was big. My only concern was team prestige affecting ratings growth. Not sure if I like this but if it keeps the small schools from becoming too good then it's a good idea. Plus good schools have better coaches, resources, etc and they might be able to improve more.

Improving physical attributes is also good if done well. Just look at Clay Matthews. The guy walks on USC as an underdeveloped kid/late bloomer. Now he's a first round draft pick with great athletic skills. Tons of kids add weight and strength but some also get faster and more athletic through growth and training.