NCAA Football 10 - Current Plans

[Pared]

Guys,

You're upset. That's obvious. This thread is about how the developers are planning on TRYING TO MAKE AMENDS. They know they messed up and are not just waiting around until next year. ON TOP OF THAT, they told you before hand, instead of waiting until you got the game, so everyone can go off how "they don't even test the game right."

Ease up. There are plenty of posts here were guys have shown their frustration in a civilized manner. Anyone that cannot follow suit will get an infraction and possibly banned from the forum.

I'm just as personally upset over this as anyone else. And how will I show them? By not buying the game, not going off on how people don't do their jobs or whatever.

Cut it out. OS is better than that. And if you've been here long enough, we expect you to know that. And if you haven't, better learn quick or your stay will be a short one.

[Happyvally74]

Quote: Originally Posted by hcopenhagenh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qDzFUn8Imw

+Great explosion off of the ball
+Carries out blocks till the end of the play
+Pancakes everyone

-Only 6'0. Too small for Div1 OL but Looks like he'll be a solid DT in college

[hcopenhagenh]

Quote: Originally Posted by Happyvally74

+Great explosion off of the ball +Carries out blocks till the end of the play +Pancakes everyone -Only 6'0. Too small for Div1 OL but Looks like he'll be a solid DT in college

Would be a very good DT even D1 college. Problem is his coach is stubborn and won't move him to the DL. Too worried about winning instead of helping the kid.

Wouldn't it be awesome though if the game played this way? If the OL would go out and engage someone instead of letting the DL run into them?

[peteykirch]

Quote: Originally Posted by Pared

Guys, You're upset. That's obvious. This thread is about how the developers are planning on TRYING TO MAKE AMENDS. They know they messed up and are not just waiting around until next year. ON TOP OF THAT, they told you before hand, instead of waiting until you got the game, so everyone can go off how "they don't even test the game right." Ease up. There are plenty of posts here were guys have shown their frustration in a civilized manner. Anyone that cannot follow suit will get an infraction and possibly banned from the forum. I'm just as personally upset over this as anyone else. And how will I show them? By not buying the game, not going off on how people don't do their jobs or whatever. Cut it out. OS is better than that. And if you've been here long enough, we expect you to know that. And if you haven't, better learn quick or your stay will be a short one.

But would they have said what they said if we the people didn't bring these questions up? Odds are if there was no demo released, and we got what we got on the demo, and the teambuilder website at LAUNCH, how much angrier do you think the community response would be?

These developers deserve to be the whipping boy until amends are made.

[Pared]

You don't know that.

And if you think that last part of your comment is true and post in such a way to construe that, your comments will be dealt with accordingly.

NO ONE, here at OS, deserves to be the "whipping boy" for whatever reason, whatever the heck that means. We don't have developers participating here at OS so we can use them as scapegoats for any reason.

If you need an outlet, go outside and do something. But being a jerk on OS to any member, developers included, will result in the appropriate action.

Echo your frustrations with intelligence in your posts. That's all anyone here asks.

[peteykirch]

Quote: Originally Posted by Pared

You don't know that. And if you think that last part of your comment is true and post in such a way to construe that, your comments will be dealt with accordingly. NO ONE, here at OS, deserves to be the "whipping boy" for whatever reason, whatever the heck that means. We don't have developers participating here at OS so we can use them as scapegoats for any reason. If you need an outlet, go outside and do something. But being a jerk on OS to any member, developers included, will result in the appropriate action. Echo your frustrations with intelligence in your posts. That's all anyone here asks.

I'm not calling for anyone's head, but you don't think that these people from EA deserve the negativity they are getting?

I've never just went on a tirade lamb-basting these people, but when they have this many slip ups with this one game...over and over...they kind of get what they deserve.

Just as long as you don't go EA should go die, but you constructively criticize them..it's open game.

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by peteykirch

But would they have said what they said if we the people didn't bring these questions up? Odds are if there was no demo released, and we got what we got on the demo, and the teambuilder website at LAUNCH, how much angrier do you think the community response would be?

seems to me that the devs interacting with the community is paying dividends.

Just my take.

[peteykirch]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

seems to me that the devs interacting with the community is paying dividends. Just my take.

Um...and on the other hand...if they didn't?

Maybe I'm old fashion but this is how I look at it.

Do a good job, get rewarded...Put this product out as it is so far for NCAA10 and you are going to have to face the music.

Especially with the new features...If you put so much time and effort into something new like Team Builder, why not check it more than once to make sure the right rosters are on there, to make sure there isn't a fiasco at the current moment. I know if I am doing something for the first time, and I have to hand it in. I check it not once, not twice, hell not three times, I go OCD and check it about a 100 times if it is something which in this case could make or break the game.

What happens to those gamers with no internet connection? EA just alienated that whole demographic, I doubt they are going to repress the disc with the correct rosters which they will supposedly have up on Launch Date.