NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution

[Buckeyes_Doc]

I had to chuckle at that video.

[jfsolo]

I'm playing 2016 with two top recruited WR's 95 and 87 OVR respectively. Their speed, acceleration, agility, catching, route running, and release ratings are all excellent, so they are still able to get open and make plays all over the field. Their production is essential what you would expect it to be.

Yes, its clear to see that they don't elude defenders in space very well because of their low ratings in the "shake and bake" categories, thus their effectiveness on screens and in the return game is greatly diminished.

I would be O.K. if I had to play the game this way, but it is something that does need to be fixed.

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by Buckeyes_Doc

I had to chuckle at that video.

It is pretty funny, i almost died laughing the first time i saw a kick that bad, and this video wasn't actually the first time i saw a kick that bad, just the first i thought to save and upload.

[mgoblue678]

Quote: Originally Posted by jfsolo

I'm playing 2016 with two top recruited WR's 95 and 87 OVR respectively. Their speed, acceleration, agility, catching, route running, and release ratings are all excellent, so they are still able to get open and make plays all over the field. Their production is essential what you would expect it to be. Yes, its clear to see that they don't elude defenders in space very well because of their low ratings in the "shake and bake" categories, thus their effectiveness on screens and in the return game is greatly diminished. I would be O.K. if I had to play the game this way, but it is something that does need to be fixed.

That is two top WR recruits as well. For the most part the 4* and 5* are fine except for in a couple of categories like you mentioned. The major dropoff comes from 2* and 3* players, way too many of those guys end up being terrible. Not saying they shouldn't worse on average than the 4* and 5*, but not as large a percentage should be bad.

That doesn't even factor in all the 1* guys who quite frankly don't belong in the game being signed by CPU teams who end being useless.

[cincy sean]

yea the ratings are screwed, the depth chart is screwed, There is a senior wr that was fresh to sr year @ ohio state that went +1 in elu over a 4 year period,
houston, we have a problem

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by cincy sean

yea the ratings are screwed, the depth chart is screwed, There is a senior wr that was fresh to sr year @ ohio state that went +1 in elu over a 4 year period, houston, we have a problem

This is another big problem, so many teams Depth charts get so out of wack, too much hoarding going on. Also, i've also noticed that The depth chart automatically re-orders itself every year, and it does it in the worst way, by doing this like putting safeties at corner, and having one player playing back up for 3-4 different positions i.e the second string ROLB, is also the back up at middle and ROLB causing huge fatigue issues in the game.

[beauforsure]

Quote: Originally Posted by dan_457

This is another big problem, so many teams Depth charts get so out of wack, too much hoarding going on. Also, i've else noticed that The depth chart automatically re-orders itself every year, and it does it in the worst way, by doing this like putting safeties at corner, and having one player playing back up for 3-4 different positions i.e the second string ROLB, is also the back up at middle and ROLB causing huge fatigue issues in the game.

BINGO... I think we found the problem... No wonder they act like idoits, they are being overused plus they suck...

[cincy sean]

Pasta padre tweeted me a sec ago and said this was being fixed for the upcoming patch...... so maybe they do know and have just kept it hush. who knows.