NCAA Football 12 Title Update #2 Details

[uncballer11]

Quote: Originally Posted by ditchrider1

Don't think the patch goes in until later this month from what they said, so if this freezing issue is supposed to be fixed via the patch then it will continue until they release the patch.

Does anyone know if a regular online dynasty with no TB teams will run smoothly?

[Araxen]

Just two RTG fixes? This part of the game is so broken atm.

[jfsolo]

Quote: Originally Posted by mbberry

how would everyone feel if ncaa 13 came out with no new features, no upgraded graphics or physics, no improvements of any kind but with updated rosters, uniforms, stadiums etc, AND ABSOLUTELY NO BUGS OR GLITCHES? i honestly think i would be ok with that. just a thought. edit: on august 4th i would probably be 5 years into my dynasty instead of waiting on year two

I wouldn't buy the game. For me, improvements in gameplay, A.I. and mode functionality, even small improvements, are exponentially more important than a bug/glitch free game.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by N51_rob

I would be okay with 2 year dev cycles. Not what you were asking, but yes I would be okay with your above scenario as well. Sent from RedskinNation.

I've been saying for years a 2 year dev cycle would be advantageous for us. It just will never happen, but one can dream.

[Kingfish]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

I've been saying for years a 2 year dev cycle would be advantageous for us. It just will never happen, but one can dream.

Only way it would work is if they go subscription based OR they could charge $119.90 so the 'suits' wouldn't think they were loosing money. Its all about the cash.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kingfish

Only way it would work is if they go subscription based OR they could charge $119.90 so the 'suits' wouldn't think they were loosing money. Its all about the cash.

Which is exactly why I said it will never happen. Which imo, is unfortunate.

[DJ]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

I've been saying for years a 2 year dev cycle would be advantageous for us. It just will never happen, but one can dream.

Could they do something like Call of Duty and have 2 teams working on NCAA? That way, each team would be operating on a 2-year cycle but we would still get an annual release.

[bluechip52]

When you build on to the game to make it better and better every year you stand the chance of letting off just one time and watching it crash. The best example in video game history IMO is Front Page Sports. Us old timers remember this game as the best ever and it got better till one year the company rested and it all crashed. the advances in that game were incredible. if the company never lost steam the games today would be years from there they are now. one to remember that the hardware has not changed in years so it is difficult to write for an "old" system. the next gen systems will bring out the very best and make the games as lifelike as they are today with the antics of players owners and commentator as organic to real life.