NBA 2K13 Ratings: Austin Rivers - 67, Amare Stoudemire - 84, Chris Paul - 94

[Thunder Storm]

As soon as I saw that Amare 84 in the title I knew this thread would be full of whining and bishing. Not even gonna read all this lol. Just wait for the game guys.

2K is just predicting a bounce back year.

[Mac33]

Quote: Originally Posted by KB2009Champ

No offense but this thread was created to discuss their ratings. We are all feigning for the game and who does it hurt for a ratings debate/discussion to occur in a thread about ratings? Don't click the link next time if these discussions get on your nerves. Really simple solution IMO.

No offense but what was unwarranted about his reply? He can't voice his opinion like everyone else? He also makes a valid point. Moreover he never said people couldn't discuss ratings or that it got on his nerves. Its a big enough community for all of us. Just saying.


Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

[ye24]

Quote: Originally Posted by madman773

I just hope they dont overrate kobe at the begging of the season cause he should be a 89 or somwhere in that area.avging 30ppg and shotting 43% from the field for a 6'7 sg is not good at all.

First off they already showed Kobe's rating and it's higher than 89.

And how do you feel about Deron Williams being 90+? He put up 21ppg on 40% last year...so he should be like a 81 right?

[MrBigShot1]

How is averaging 30ppg, which he didn't do anyway not good? I don't think CP3 should be a 94 though. Pre-injury Cp3, 07-08, sure. Current cp3? I think its 3 or 4 points too high. Amare/Austin Rivers are fine imo.

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by tuck243

You are fooling my friend... 67 for a player that is a great scorer is not acceptable especially since Dion Waiters was a 71... Seem too low to me...

I know what he is vs. NCAA competition. Vs NBA competition he has done nothing. No such thing as underrated. Let him prove his worth.

You are the one fooling here.

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by speedy9386

Just because they haven't played yet doesn't mean they don't have skill.

Until they prove that the skill exists vs. the new level of competition the skill doesn't exist.

[beast10]

Quote: Originally Posted by Colts18

Until they prove that the skill exists vs. the new level of competition the skill doesn't exist.

Okay, so your saying if (Ex.) LeBron James was coming into the league you would give him a 67 because he is unproven ?
JS .. But anyways it's going to take a while for Rivers to get use to the NBA level and he's basically going to have to change his entire game if the Hornets really want to play him at point .
I also think he is going to battle with some injuries, he drives to the hoop WAY to aggressive .

[b2tha2ndpwr]

I think Austin River's flashy style of play and potential for large scoring outputs make people want his rating to be higher than it should. 67's about right for a rookie. I'm sure his "potential" rating's in the 80's. I went to two Duke games last year and he looked lost from a team defense standpoint and when he didn't have the ball in his hands on offense so his awareness rating's probably rather low.

Besides, if he outperforms that rating that's what roster updates are for

Is Dion Waiters really a 71? If so that's definitely too high