NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team

[ndirish6776]

ND seems pretty accurate all around. Carlisle and Atkinson at RB are both probably a bit high but I don't think any ND fans would be shocked if they both have great years. Would have made them 85-87 as opposed to 89s. Fox at MLB is overrated and too fast while Shembo at OLB is underrated and too slow. Tuitt is underrated as a 91, and Jackson is a bit underrated at CB.

I'm surprised Jones and Russell aren't 88s, but I'm sure ND is going to have a TON of starters in the 84-87 range as these rankings seem low for a team that is a 93 on offense and defense.

But Golson being in the game makes up for anyone else being overrated lol.

[Strategizer]

Would like to see Missouri's if someone gets the chance.

[DirtyJerz32]

Quote: Originally Posted by harlemkiid149

do people actually still run the GTech triple option?(i gave up on NCAA a while ago)

I ran it for 3 year in my OD and had great success. Just switch to the spread the last 2 years because I only have 1 star running back.

[BurghFan]

Damn, nobody in the 90's and only 5 guys in the 80's. Gonna be an uphill battle with Pitt. (not that I'm all that surprised)

[BleedGreen710]

Quote: Originally Posted by 32

Stupid iPhone. Any chance someone could show me PSU?

[Rolltide78980]

Could someone post alabama's? Thx

[GruffyMcGuiness]

Quote: Originally Posted by harlemkiid149

do people actually still run the GTech triple option?(i gave up on NCAA a while ago)

I don't. Blocking is horrendous so I usually just run the Nevada playbook since we run a lot of pistol now.

[GruffyMcGuiness]

Quote: Originally Posted by BurghFan

Damn, nobody in the 90's and only 5 guys in the 80's. Gonna be an uphill battle with Pitt. (not that I'm all that surprised)

Welcome to the ACC! :thumbup: