NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team

[smack23011]

Really???? Oklahoma State is so off. #87 WR Tracy Moore is one of the best WRs in the BIG12 along with #5. smh at that one. Jeremy Smith will be good no doubt about it but the best player on the team eh ok fine.

[heismanu]

Quote: Originally Posted by smack23011

Really???? Oklahoma State is so off. #87 WR Tracy Moore is one of the best WRs in the BIG12 along with #5. smh at that one. Jeremy Smith will be good no doubt about it but the best player on the team eh ok fine.

^^^^this #5 is Josh Stewart and he's quicker than he is fast...i mean does EA even pay attention? do they scout at all? Where the hell are they getting this info from?

[cparrish]

Of course the ratings are not accurate as EA is being sued currently for player likeness. C'mon people!

[The JareBear]

Quote: Originally Posted by cparrish

Of course the ratings are not accurate as EA is being sued currently for player likeness. C'mon people!

This is why I'm amazed by how angry people still get over it.

[cparrish]

Quote: Originally Posted by jaredlib

This is why I'm amazed by how angry people still get over it.

It's becoming a broken record as it happens ever year. I am getting to the point where I need to just stay off OS the week of E3 to avoid all the "what, John Doe is only a 79, are you kidding me?!?!?!" talk.

[BV11]

Quote: Originally Posted by cparrish

It's becoming a broken record as it happens ever year. I am getting to the point where I need to just stay off OS the week of E3 to avoid all the "what, John Doe is only a 79, are you kidding me?!?!?!" talk.

The only reason I complain about it is because I spend at least half of my time on NCAA playing ranked online games where you can't play with edited rosters. And also if EA wasn't trying to make an accurate roster I wouldn't care either, but it is obvious that they are. If you are going to go 95% of the way why not just go the full distance or not at all.

[Swamp Swagger]

Quote: Originally Posted by BV11

The only reason I complain about it is because I spend at least half of my time on NCAA playing ranked online games where you can't play with edited rosters. And also if EA wasn't trying to make an accurate roster I wouldn't care either, but it is obvious that they are. If you are going to go 95% of the way why not just go the full distance or not at all.

That's what I was thinking

It's like they are going 50/50. Just enough to keep us happy but not enough for people to use against them. But I mean for the most part they are not really fooling anybody because they do get the top players close to right.

But I guess if it means keeping the College football game around for many years to come I'm all for it

[Gap Integrity]

I honestly think we could avoid a lot of the controversy if EA allowed unranked online games with edited rosters allowed.

- If the game is unranked, you could easily quit if someone cheeses or has a jank roster.
-allow both users to preview the team roster they have both selected to validate it as a legit file. This would be done at the team selection menu.
-only friends on your list can be invited to a private match.
-allow modified sliders.

Imagine how nice this would be? say you have a few close buddies you want to play online without being in a dynasty, you can play friends with custom rosters, or historical files as well. I thought of this after spending a ton of time editing a roster, and wanted to be able to enjoy using all the teams opposed to one or a few in dynasty. If it's unranked, we should be able to use our own rosters in private matches.