Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years? - Page 16 - Operation Sports Forums
Home

Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

This is a discussion on Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years? within the Pro Basketball and Fantasy Talk forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Basketball > Pro Basketball and Fantasy Talk
New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-09-2013, 03:03 PM   #121
Hall Of Fame
 
ojandpizza's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29,895
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilVendingMachine

He's a RFA, i doubt the jazz let him walk.
Depends. If they draft Parker or Wiggins they could use that money to bring in someone else.

They could just move Hayward to the SG spot, but I guess depends which free agents would come to them.
ojandpizza is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-09-2013, 04:48 PM   #122
Bamma
 
ProfessaPackMan's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC/MD
Posts: 63,869
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

For Hayward's sake, he'll stay in Utah or at least avoid LA(I'll throw NY in here as well)if he can.
__________________
#RespectTheCulture
ProfessaPackMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 05:31 PM   #123
Moderator
 
Majingir's Arena
 
OVR: 22
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,071
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilVendingMachine
Toronto might make us take Fields back, which would be a deal breaker, probably.

He's a RFA, i doubt the jazz let him walk.
Lowry,Fields and MAYBE a 2nd round draft pick for Nash(and all of his contract) and a 2014 first?

But based on what you said, that might not be what Lakers want.
Majingir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 09:34 PM   #124
MVP
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southern California
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majingir
Lowry,Fields and MAYBE a 2nd round draft pick for Nash(and all of his contract) and a 2014 first?

But based on what you said, that might not be what Lakers want.
The Lakers can't trade their pick this year. And as much as I'd like to have Lowry, why would they take on Field's contract and on top of that give up a first in a loaded class to get a guy who they can just sign this summer? They can also use the stretch provision on Nash and pay a third of his salary. They're not that desperate.

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
__________________
GT: assassinK24
KSOR24 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 11:21 PM   #125
SOLDIER, First Class...
 
JazzMan's Arena
 
OVR: 23
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 13,564
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Honestly, Hayward is a much better small forward than a shooting guard, in my opinion. His height is a big mismatch when he plays the 2, but these days, 2-guards are just too quick, with undersized guys in the West like Ellis, Bledsoe, etc.

If LA offers him enough money that the Jazz won't match the offer (which would probably be around the 4-Year, $40M-$50M range), then they can put him at the 3 next to Kobe.

But I hope to God that doesn't happen. I'd rather see a Hayward/Parker or Hayward/Wiggins pairing in Utah.
__________________
Twitter: @TyroneisMaximus
PSN: JazzMan_OS

Green Bay Packers
Utah Jazz
Nebraska Cornhuskers

Dibs: AJ Lee
JazzMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-10-2013, 10:54 AM   #126
MVP
 
Melbournelad's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,567
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzMan
Honestly, Hayward is a much better small forward than a shooting guard, in my opinion. His height is a big mismatch when he plays the 2, but these days, 2-guards are just too quick, with undersized guys in the West like Ellis, Bledsoe, etc.

If LA offers him enough money that the Jazz won't match the offer (which would probably be around the 4-Year, $40M-$50M range), then they can put him at the 3 next to Kobe.

But I hope to God that doesn't happen. I'd rather see a Hayward/Parker or Hayward/Wiggins pairing in Utah.
Lakers won't overpay, especially on a 4 year deal. Thy can't afford to kill any of their flexibility for 2015 or 16 FA. Unless their content to let Kobe finish his career on a low seed playoff team.
Melbournelad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 01:20 PM   #127
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2012
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSOR24
The Lakers can't trade their pick this year. And as much as I'd like to have Lowry, why would they take on Field's contract and on top of that give up a first in a loaded class to get a guy who they can just sign this summer? They can also use the stretch provision on Nash and pay a third of his salary. They're not that desperate.

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
If they trade for Lowry, they get his Bird rights.
Also, why can't they trade their pick?
EvilVendingMachine is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 01:54 PM   #128
Moderator
 
Majingir's Arena
 
OVR: 22
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 47,071
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Sound off: Who Should LA Surround Kobe With the Next Two Years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KSOR24
The Lakers can't trade their pick this year. And as much as I'd like to have Lowry, why would they take on Field's contract and on top of that give up a first in a loaded class to get a guy who they can just sign this summer? They can also use the stretch provision on Nash and pay a third of his salary. They're not that desperate.

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
By can't, I assume you just mean can't as in they shouldn't. And they'd take Fields only if they aren't willing to take on some of Nashs salary next year. Cause I'm sure they know it'll be hard to move an almost 10M contract, so taking on a couple million is something they'd need to do.

And they'd trade for Lowry if it means they can resign him. If anything like this were to happen, I'm sure one of the conditions on the deal is that Lakers are able to work out a deal with Lowry before the trade actually happens.
Majingir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Basketball > Pro Basketball and Fantasy Talk »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.
Top -