NBA 2K16 Player Ratings - Top Rated Shooting Guards (UPDATED)

[Mauer4MVP]

Quote: Originally Posted by BluFu

Of course they are... but the SG position is really weak. Saying they're top 10 SGs right now isn't overrating them at all lol

I think there can be an argument for Wade. Kobe... no chance.

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP

I think there can be an argument for Wade. Kobe... no chance.

Man I see y'all saying Derozan is a top 10 SG and I think dude is horrible , Wade is def top 10 production wise . Kobe is barley top 10 at the moment cuz of his production as well even tho it's a really small sample size

[Mauer4MVP]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

Man I see y'all saying Derozan is a top 10 SG and I think dude is horrible , Wade is def top 10 production wise . Kobe is barley top 10 at the moment cuz of his production as well even tho it's a really small sample size

Derozan is pretty much the same as Kobe is now except he's more athletic and stays healthy.

[J_Posse]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

Attachment 106534Attachment 106535

Dude, so many of the ratings are of a subjective nature (defense outside of blocks/steals, athleticism, offensive/defensive IQ & passing vision/IQ/accuracy) that the whole "HOF" scale won't apply to them. In the end, the ratings are determined by one person and how he views the NBA with help from statistics (when available).

I don't agree with the thought that Jamal Crawford or Manu Ginobili are better than Danny Green. Nor do I agree that Dwyane Wade and Kobe Bryant are still elite, all-star caliber players in today's NBA.

from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP

Derozan is pretty much the same as Kobe is now except he's more athletic and stays healthy.

I know that which I said barley top 10 which is what Derozan is . One of y'all said you would put Derozan over Wade .

[JJFurr29]

Quote: Originally Posted by J_Posse

Dude, so many of the ratings are of a subjective nature (defense outside of blocks/steals, athleticism, offensive/defensive IQ & passing vision/IQ/accuracy) that the whole "HOF" scale won't apply to them. In the end, the ratings are determined by one person and how he views the NBA with help from statistics (when available). I don't agree with the thought that Jamal Crawford or Manu Ginobili are better than Danny Green. Nor do I agree that Dwyane Wade and Kobe Bryant are still elite, all-star caliber players in today's NBA. from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

I'd probably put Crawford above Green, I don't think very highly of him. probably JJ Redick and Manu too

[BluFu]

Quote: Originally Posted by J_Posse

Nor do I agree that Dwyane Wade and Kobe Bryant are still elite, all-star caliber players in today's NBA.

They were both all-stars last season

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Think you're buying into the overalls too much without seeing the individual stats . And to the Wade not being an all star caliber player well I guess that's why opinions aren't factual . Still don't see how his stat line makes him look terrible and he didn't even play over 32 mpg lol


Per 36

24.3 Ppg
5.5 apg
4 rpg
1.3 spg
6.8fta
47% FG

Looks pretty damn good to me but we're talking in circles everyone is pretty much in their stance