More Links

RaychelSnr · 09-22-2015, 09:53 AM

FIFA is a game that divides the community like no other. On one hand there’s the online crowd, partly comprised of Ultimate Team fans who prefer a quicker pace and in general, more open gameplay. On the other, there is the offline simulation bunch who like to slow things down (whether it be through changing gameplay sliders or the speed of the game) and play primarily vs the CPU in Career Mode. While there are some who can navigate between both worlds, it’s clear that the two groups have separate ideas of what direction FIFA should take. If early indications are true, it looks like EA has listened to and catered the game to the simulation crowd.

Read More - FIFA 16 Review (PS4/XB1)

RoyceDa59 · 09-22-2015, 10:16 AM

Kev, I think you will be the only one on the internet rating FIFA higher than PES very well detailed review. I think this is the first FIFA release I have been excited for.

SeaTownGamer · 09-22-2015, 10:18 AM

I respect your opinion but I just don't see how FIFA gets a higher score than PES this year by most reviewers like the previous poster brought up. I know I shouldn't bring up the other game in the FIFA forums so I apologize in advanced.

schnakenpopanz · 09-22-2015, 10:22 AM

Pass accuracy too high? We seem to play a different game. It looks like ping pong to me

HenryClay1844 · 09-22-2015, 10:24 AM

Pretty much spot on. One problem is that player instructions (Stay back Busqutes!) don't seem to work. Gameplay problems pretty minor when compared to past games or PES. Career Mode (youth teams and real managers) and licensing still need work.

KG · 09-22-2015, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoyceDa59


	Kev, I think you will be the only one on the internet rating FIFA higher than PES very well detailed review. I think this is the first FIFA release I have been excited for.

It's all good. I've read a few reviews so far but EA's embargo is STRONG so I'm sure there will be a ton of them up today.

Should be interesting.

Teirminator · 09-22-2015, 10:33 AM

Have to agree with schnakenpopanz. I guess maybe its still too high for some, but I am finding it a lot less accurate than previous FIFA games. Some of that is the improved defensive AI, cutting off passing lanes, but some of it is definitely the passes themselves. Seeing more variation / sensitivity in strength. And the placement seems more varied as well.

I haven't been able to get the gang together for a true Pro Clubs match yet - they're all playing NHL - but the couple of drop-in matches I played were very "ping-pongy". Single-player against the AI did not have as much of the ping-pong going on.

rspencer86 · 09-22-2015, 11:39 AM

Not much said about one of my biggest beefs with '15: do CPU teams actually play unique styles? It seemed like every team played the same way last year.

09-22-2015, 09:53 AM	#1
RaychelSnr Executive Editor OVR: 57 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Oklahoma City, OK Posts: 4,846 Blog Entries: 490	FIFA 16 Review (PS4/XB1) FIFA is a game that divides the community like no other. On one hand there’s the online crowd, partly comprised of Ultimate Team fans who prefer a quicker pace and in general, more open gameplay. On the other, there is the offline simulation bunch who like to slow things down (whether it be through changing gameplay sliders or the speed of the game) and play primarily vs the CPU in Career Mode. While there are some who can navigate between both worlds, it’s clear that the two groups have separate ideas of what direction FIFA should take. If early indications are true, it looks like EA has listened to and catered the game to the simulation crowd. Read More - FIFA 16 Review (PS4/XB1) Platform: PC / PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox One bad_philanthropy, Wolfpack44 and RoyceDa59 like this.

09-22-2015, 10:16 AM	#2
RoyceDa59 Chillin OVR: 10 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Ontario / Charlotte Posts: 3,840	Re: FIFA 16 Review (PS4/XB1) Kev, I think you will be the only one on the internet rating FIFA higher than PES very well detailed review. I think this is the first FIFA release I have been excited for. ROABS, ZO, SeaTownGamer and 1 others like this.

09-22-2015, 10:18 AM	#3
SeaTownGamer MVP OVR: 0 Join Date: Jul 2015	Re: FIFA 16 Review (PS4/XB1) I respect your opinion but I just don't see how FIFA gets a higher score than PES this year by most reviewers like the previous poster brought up. I know I shouldn't bring up the other game in the FIFA forums so I apologize in advanced. PeruvianPlaya954 likes this. Last edited by SeaTownGamer; 09-22-2015 at 10:22 AM.

	New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
	The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
	Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival

09-22-2015, 10:22 AM	#4
schnakenpopanz Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Dec 2008	Pass accuracy too high? We seem to play a different game. It looks like ping pong to me

09-22-2015, 10:24 AM	#5
HenryClay1844 Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Jul 2013	Pretty much spot on. One problem is that player instructions (Stay back Busqutes!) don't seem to work. Gameplay problems pretty minor when compared to past games or PES. Career Mode (youth teams and real managers) and licensing still need work.

09-22-2015, 10:33 AM	#7
Teirminator Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Jan 2014	Have to agree with schnakenpopanz. I guess maybe its still too high for some, but I am finding it a lot less accurate than previous FIFA games. Some of that is the improved defensive AI, cutting off passing lanes, but some of it is definitely the passes themselves. Seeing more variation / sensitivity in strength. And the placement seems more varied as well. I haven't been able to get the gang together for a true Pro Clubs match yet - they're all playing NHL - but the couple of drop-in matches I played were very "ping-pongy". Single-player against the AI did not have as much of the ping-pong going on.

09-22-2015, 11:39 AM	#8
rspencer86 MIB Crew OVR: 49 Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Kansas City, MO Posts: 8,814 Blog Entries: 15	Not much said about one of my biggest beefs with '15: do CPU teams actually play unique styles? It seemed like every team played the same way last year.