Madden NFL 16 Title Update #2 Available Now, Full Details Included

[ggsimmonds]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jets1026

After the update WR shading isn't working for me any more. Is that normal? For example before on defence I used to come out in a zone play and shade a CB either in or out and it used to work. Now when I try to shade the WR, The CB stays in a zone. The only way Im able to shade is to manually switch to the CB that is covering the WR and shade in or out. Am I the only one having this issue??? any help is appreciated

To make sure I understand this correctly, you use to come out in zone and shade a WR left/right and this changed the corner back to a man assignment.
Now after the patch he no longer switches to man coverage?

Well this sucks for me, I frequently do this type of change. More work for my thumbs I guess.

[Iampalafox11]

Quote: Originally Posted by IcedCoffee1983

Interesting, that would suggest better AWR prog/regression with QB's on CPU controlled teams. Were the results generally the same with other QB's in the league? This could be good news. Also not to be a bother... but could you post the top 10 or so LT's in the league and how many sacks they gave up? I ask that because high sack counts were what was causing LT's to have severe regression, and perhaps they fixed the big sack totals allowed by LT's. Which would mean they essentially would fix the LT regression too. (Before this patch, league sack leaders would have 35-40 sacks, so hopefully your sim will now show lower totals, and therefore more realistic sack totals for LT's) If both are true it would suggest they gave some attention to both QB issues with AWR, and LT issues with regression. Lastly, THANK YOU Iampalafox11, for taking the time to run those simulations in offline mode, I know they take longer than on-line simulations. Much appreciated.

Yes the results seem to be about the same for all QBs even the back ups.

Tyron Smith: 2015: 8 Sacks, 2016: 5 Sacks, 2017: 1 Sack
Joe Thomas: 2015: 15 Sacks, 2016: 15 Sacks, 2017: 3 Sacks
Jared Veldheer: 2015: 6, 2016: 9, 2017: 8
Greg Robinson: 2015: 23, 2016: 23, 2017: 3
Jake Matthews: 2015: 8, 2016: 10, 2017: 11
Joe Stayley: 2015: 14, 2016: 14, 2017:13
Nate Solder: 2015: 5, 2016: 16, 2017: 13
Taylor Lewan: 2015: 21, 2016: 18, 2017: 15

[Mike Lowe]

I don't understand what the issue is with drive goals if you can just turn them off so easily using Booker21's workaround?

[canes21]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mike Lowe

I don't understand what the issue is with drive goals if you can just turn them off so easily using Booker21's workaround?

You can't turn them off in an online CFM which is the main reason many folks bought the game.

[James0]

You probably won't get this much, but thanks for the patch EA! At least this isn't like NBA live 15!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jdenyer]

Quote: Originally Posted by Iampalafox11

Yes the results seem to be about the same for all QBs even the back ups. Tyron Smith: 2015: 8 Sacks, 2016: 5 Sacks, 2017: 1 Sack Joe Thomas: 2015: 15 Sacks, 2016: 15 Sacks, 2017: 3 Sacks Jared Veldheer: 2015: 6, 2016: 9, 2017: 8 Greg Robinson: 2015: 23, 2016: 23, 2017: 3 Jake Matthews: 2015: 8, 2016: 10, 2017: 11 Joe Stayley: 2015: 14, 2016: 14, 2017:13 Nate Solder: 2015: 5, 2016: 16, 2017: 13 Taylor Lewan: 2015: 21, 2016: 18, 2017: 15

I can absolutely live with these numbers! Great news!
Can you confirm this is for Offline CFM with no other workarounds in play or setting changes?

[Jets1026]

Quote: Originally Posted by ggsimmonds

To make sure I understand this correctly, you use to come out in zone and shade a WR left/right and this changed the corner back to a man assignment. Now after the patch he no longer switches to man coverage? Well this sucks for me, I frequently do this type of change. More work for my thumbs I guess.

Yes correct. After installing the update it stopped working. Only way it still works is if u select cb, then select man assignment then select the WR icon. Takes alot of time. Before it used to be easier/faster

[IcedCoffee1983]

Quote: Originally Posted by IcedCoffee1983

Interesting, that would suggest better AWR prog/regression with QB's on CPU controlled teams. Were the results generally the same with other QB's in the league? This could be good news. Also not to be a bother... but could you post the top 10 or so LT's in the league and how many sacks they gave up? I ask that because high sack counts were what was causing LT's to have severe regression, and perhaps they fixed the big sack totals allowed by LT's. Which would mean they essentially would fix the LT regression too. (Before this patch, league sack leaders would have 35-40 sacks, so hopefully your sim will now show lower totals, and therefore more realistic sack totals for LT's) If both are true it would suggest they gave some attention to both QB issues with AWR, and LT issues with regression. Lastly, THANK YOU Iampalafox11, for taking the time to run those simulations in offline mode, I know they take longer than on-line simulations. Much appreciated.

Quote: Originally Posted by Iampalafox11

Yes the results seem to be about the same for all QBs even the back ups. Tyron Smith: 2015: 8 Sacks, 2016: 5 Sacks, 2017: 1 Sack Joe Thomas: 2015: 15 Sacks, 2016: 15 Sacks, 2017: 3 Sacks Jared Veldheer: 2015: 6, 2016: 9, 2017: 8 Greg Robinson: 2015: 23, 2016: 23, 2017: 3 Jake Matthews: 2015: 8, 2016: 10, 2017: 11 Joe Stayley: 2015: 14, 2016: 14, 2017:13 Nate Solder: 2015: 5, 2016: 16, 2017: 13 Taylor Lewan: 2015: 21, 2016: 18, 2017: 15

Wow, those season sack totals do look way better after the patch.

Here is a link below about this exact issue, with a screenshot on the first page showing how season sack total leaders would have like 35+ sacks.

This appears much improved.

Thanks again for running all the simulations!

Oh, here's the link...

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...egression.html