Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings Available Now For All Teams

[Chiefsfan881129]

Really surprised that Justin March The Chiefs MLB isn't in I mean he made the team last year yea he went on IR due to a Torn Miscues but he made the team.

& he gonna make the team this year as for 2nd year in a row he's a star in TC & Is Always around the ball..

When our Front office HC DC LB Coach all wave about this kid he gonna make the team he has drawn Compersions to Bart Scott from our own DC

& having been to Chiefs Training Camp & watching this kid play in the preseason last year he clearly the real deal..

Funny thing is this Kid is challenging Josh Mauga for a starting spot & if he continues to shine Magua could be out yet he's not In

Kane can you guys plz Add this kid in I'd give him about an 66 to 69 rating with 85 to 87 speed 80 to 86 tackling but Ike 45 to 58 awr since he was an undrafted free agent out of Akron last year & has no regular season experience but the other stats I mentioned are about right in what he should be..

Anyway love the new ratings setup gonna take time getting used to but I can see how deep we are & young we are no question future is bright

Nice to see Hogan with decent ratings looks like I'll be using him as my #2 since Murray & Bray have been gutted

Might Want to consider bumping Bray to 68 or 69 ovr as he looking really good in camp & is on pace to win #2 job Murray seems to be struggling atm & Hogan has been looking good as well the ratings he has are fair & accurate & it's looking like he will bump Murray off the roster.

But Bray should be bumped in his ratings

& keep an eye on Tyreek Hill the 95 speed Is nice even though with the old ratings system he clearly a 98 99 speed but with the new system the 95 speed is great.

I'm not sure if the 65 rating is due to his off season performance so far but I'll take it alot better then I thought it would be.

That said he someone to keep an eye on when it time to adjust ratings he seems to be picking up where he left off during mini camp might want to bump to 67 to 69 if he carries this over into preseason..

But no doubt his 95 speed makes him my new #1 KR & PR

Love seeing some of the ratings bumps for our rookie class from last year

All though Conley our new #2 Morse our stud County &
Wilson our other Future MLB should be rated higher based on how well they played.

Most of them are way to low Conley should be bout 74 Morse no question about it a 78 to 80
Wilson a 70 to 72 as there ratings are 2 low but hopefully they progress good in franchise.

Glad to see Steven Nelson get some love he having a great off season & is on pace to be our NB & he finally got the love he deserves thanks ea.

Also love how deep our WR core is Hopefully Mike Williams Sticks as he's a 71 but a good jump ball guy & a tackle braking machine

Lastly love Chris Jones & Russell ratings both look like they could be the stars of our rookie class & give me more options to develop in Franchise mode... Chris Jones is as Advertised he very strong all though 88 str in madden he more like 95 str just watch the videos & read his camp reports so far he the real deal..

Russell is gonna be a Dimond in the rough from this draft class kinda a young but better version of Darius Slay another former fighting Irish Though Slay has proven it in nfl when you compare there college tape he compared to Slay but a better version coming out of college.

Hope he lives up to the hype
& Demarcus Robinson kinda Disappointed about his speed rating he should be in low 90's as he known as a YAC WR with Mike Wallace Type Speed but better Protential that said his other ratings seems fine but every scouting report out there had him as a speed guy as he a yac wr & those kind of WR'S are speed guys mostly so hopefully that improves over the course of the season.

& Sean Smith is very overrated & doesn't deserve the ratings he has the guy isn't an 88 ovr CB he more of an 83 type CB I can tell you he's a guy who will get consistently bruned by Speedy WR'S

may I remind you of the Sammy Watkins game he had 158 yards total in game 154 in 1st half all on Sean Smith but the minute we put Peters on him in 2nd half Watkins was shut down only 2 rec for 4 yards Peter's basically won us that game.. there are more cases like this I can bring up AJ Green had a field day on Smith & countless others have as well

Smith can cover slower less Physical WR'S just fine but when it comes to guys like Antonio Brown,Maclin,Watkins Green,D,Thomas WR'S like that with both speed height & physicalty Smith gets taken to school i know this because I watch the games even when he was on my team i felt he was very overrated so lower him like he should be thx



Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

[Datninja619]

Keenan Allen 88 OVR 89 SPD, 92 ACC, 91 Catching, 89 Spec, 94 CIT, 94 RTE ,87 Release
Jason Verrett 88 OVR 93 SPD, 93 ACC, 77 Catching, 93 Man, 89 Zone, 82 Play Rec

I like it!! Since coming in the league Allen has always been the most well balanced elite WR in the game.

[87Birdman]

Man looking at denver's defense had me excited till I looked for their other MLB and had to go way down the list. Todd davis who filed in for Danny a few years ago rated in at a 64.

Zaire anderson who was on the practice squad last year is no where to be found. Jordan Taylor who had been making a splash at camp and was Manning's training partner last year during his injury didn't make the roster either.

O and I will probably have to use Sanchez the first year since his competition in Trevor fit rated at a 60 or so. Lynch is rated higher but with our offensive line coming in with pretty much low 70s I'm going to let Sanchez take the bearing till I can improve it lol

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using Tapatalk

[brza37]

Quote: Originally Posted by charter04

So which player should be lower than 80? Romo, Dez, Witten, Smith, Frederick, Lee, Scandrick, Crawford, Collins, Martin, Elliott, Lawernce, McClain? I'm not completely disagree with with you but, everyone knows injuries to Romo and Dez played a huge role in going from 11 wins with them to 4 without. Most of the 80+ overall guys are on offense. The defense has less as it should. If key players stay healthy and they go 4-12 this year I'll shake your hand and say you where right. I just don't see that happening

I would start with the guys you left off the list above: Church, Williams, Free. Also think there are DTs and DEs rated lower than Crawford and Lawrence that are better than them.

And I'm not saying they will be a 4-12 team if Romo stays healthy. I am just saying they should not be the second highest rated team in the game. In the horrible NFC East making the playoffs is always a possibility but they don't belong in the top 10 teams, let alone top 2.

[noplace]

Quote: Originally Posted by charter04

So which player should be lower than 80? Romo, Dez, Witten, Smith, Frederick, Lee, Scandrick, Crawford, Collins, Martin, Elliott, Lawernce, McClain? I'm not completely disagree with with you but, everyone knows injuries to Romo and Dez played a huge role in going from 11 wins with them to 4 without. Most of the 80+ overall guys are on offense. The defense has less as it should. If key players stay healthy and they go 4-12 this year I'll shake your hand and say you where right. I just don't see that happening

I have no problem with the offensive ratings but some of the defensive ratings just doesn’t make sense . So are we rating them off potential, actual player stats or league stats? Here's my issue...

Example: Will Compton starting LB Redskins 70 overall 96 tackles in 15’ rated lower than his backups P. Riley and Mason Foster.

Versus Cowboys Anthony Hitchens LB 74 overall 67 tackles in 15’, Andrew Gachkar 71 overall 14 tackles in 15’ K. Wilber 73 overall 24 tackles in 15’.. So what gives? Some of these guys arent even projected starters..

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by brza37

I would start with the guys you left off the list above: Church, Williams, Free. Also think there are DTs and DEs rated lower than Crawford and Lawrence that are better than them. And I'm not saying they will be a 4-12 team if Romo stays healthy. I am just saying they should not be the second highest rated team in the game. In the horrible NFC East making the playoffs is always a possibility but they don't belong in the top 10 teams, let alone top 2.

How do you know they are the #2 rated team on the game? That info isn't out yet.

I can agree with the guys you mentioned. I wasn't looking at the ratings I was just listing guys off the top of my head.

As far as Crawford and Lawrence having guys rated lower that are better. I'd have to look. I think those and Free should be 80+.

It's a good debate none the less.

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by noplace

I have no problem with the offensive ratings but some of the defensive ratings just doesn’t make sense . So are we rating them off potential, actual player stats or league stats? Here's my issue... Example: Will Compton starting LB Redskins 70 overall 96 tackles in 15’ rated lower than his backups P. Riley and Mason Foster. Versus Cowboys Anthony Hitchens LB 74 overall 67 tackles in 15’, Andrew Gachkar 71 overall 14 tackles in 15’ K. Wilber 73 overall 24 tackles in 15’.. So what gives? Some of these guys arent even projected starters..

So an Eagles and Redskins fan doesn't like the Cowboys ratings? Lol

JK.

I'm not sure about the guys you mentioned. As far as why they are rated that high. Obviously ratings can't only be based on production or Rookies would be 0 in every none physical rating.

Hitchens started a lot this past year. So did Wilber.

Gachkar start a game or two but was mostly special teams.

I would have no problem with those three be lower than 70.

[cdub71323]

Do you know who initially released this so we can try and get the free agents ratings as well?