MLB The Show 17 Gameplay Video - Toronto Blue Jays vs. New York Yankees (Full Game)

[Russell_SCEA]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

Loving what I see, but man outfielders hug the lines far too much on the corners. Or perhaps more so, maybe it's just that they play too shallow. Whatever the case, I'll definitely be playing with fielder speed and reaction sliders again this year. Also, I want me this broadcast fielding cam (stationary, with pan and zoom abilities of course). Maybe a hair higher, otherwise it's great! Someday...

They are positioned where they need to be for our game and balance. So we have the proper amount of extra base hits.

[Cory4AU]

All of the batting stances I have seen this year look so much improved. They look a lot smoother and natural. I'm going to have a tough time picking one for my RTTS player. This game looks so good.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[hb5239799]

I'm still in decision mode on which TV to purchase (50" range). Hopefully they'll let us know the minimum on getting the best graphical performance so I can narrow down my options


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WhiteBunny]

This year it looks much smoother and fluid. Some faces, especially beards and hairs, look stunning and i really appreciate the new sliders for body types. Also grass is improved. So far i'm pretty happy graphical wise. I see maybe too many linedrives and bombs, but they were playing at rookie or veteran level. I suppose it was Hybrid presentation, right ?

( i really want to watch two innings on Broadcast without skipping any cutscene ! ).

[earthlight897]

Matchup stats, new commentary, mlb network, updated players were some of the things I had in the wishlist thread for 17. Thank you for actually listening to your customers.

[WhiteM5]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

Loving what I see, but man outfielders hug the lines far too much on the corners. Or perhaps more so, maybe it's just that they play too shallow. Whatever the case, I'll definitely be playing with fielder speed and reaction sliders again this year. Also, I want me this broadcast fielding cam (stationary, with pan and zoom abilities of course). Maybe a hair higher, otherwise it's great! Someday...

I'll co-sign this post in terms of the playable fielding cam, but I actually don't want any zoom (or maybe just a touch but I want to see ball flight to create drama/suspense in terms of if its going to be a HR) and no cut-scenes at all.

As far as positioning, its why sliders were invented. Not a big deal IMO. If a guy hits a double, does it matter if he barely makes it into second so long as the outcome is a double. I mean, the devs do the best they can to represent the game. I think tinkering with outfield sizes or messing with positioning would likely create other issues at this point. To me the extra base hits are basically dialed in, particularly when I saw a ball go over the head of a CF in one of the earlier vids from this year. I also suspect the new physics and wind may help in this regard.

[Cory4AU]

Quote: Originally Posted by hb5239799

I'm still in decision mode on which TV to purchase (50" range). Hopefully they'll let us know the minimum on getting the best graphical performance so I can narrow down my options Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not to get off topic but I was just in the same boat a couple of days ago. I went with the Sony x800d 49". It's superb. It really came down to the Sony or Samsung.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[jada855]

Got excited when I saw Joe Girardi giving signs from the dugout. Then realized it had no effect on the game and was just a cutscene!