Video of The Show 10 in 3D

[JoeRyan33]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3flB_rJj-98

[ChubbyBanana]

Doesn't look that different to me through the glases, however it's a neat concept.

[ShowTyme15]

Already been posted bro.

[Blzer]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChubbyBanana

Doesn't look that different to me through the glases, however it's a neat concept.

Well to be fair, we're only looking through one of the lenses. To be even fairer, we're watching this on a 2D screen haha. The concept of shooting footage of a 3D thing and displaying it on something 2D is almost... I don't know what the term is... I want to say "redundant", but that's not what I'm looking for. Kind of like filming something that's HD and then uploading it in SD. It defeats the purpose I suppose.

But either way, you still get an idea of what's going on in scope. In the video you sort of get a sense of depth, even though you don't grasp the concept in its entirety.

[dickey1331]

Agreed. I will have to see it "in person" to decide if I like it.

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

Well to be fair, we're only looking through one of the lenses. To be even fairer, we're watching this on a 2D screen haha. The concept of shooting footage of a 3D thing and displaying it on something 2D is almost... I don't know what the term is... I want to say "redundant", but that's not what I'm looking for. Kind of like filming something that's HD and then uploading it in SD. It defeats the purpose I suppose. But either way, you still get an idea of what's going on in scope. In the video you sort of get a sense of depth, even though you don't grasp the concept in its entirety.

[Ronstr]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChubbyBanana

Doesn't look that different to me through the glases, however it's a neat concept.

That's because the video's only looking through one of the lens

[snowmizer]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

Well to be fair, we're only looking through one of the lenses. To be even fairer, we're watching this on a 2D screen haha. The concept of shooting footage of a 3D thing and displaying it on something 2D is almost... I don't know what the term is... I want to say "redundant", but that's not what I'm looking for.

"Pointless" is as accurate a term as any.

[Blzer]

Quote: Originally Posted by snowmizer

"Pointless" is as accurate a term as any.

D'oh! Easiest word to come up with, too. Thanks.

Though I was trying to come up with a term that specifically described the lengths taken to reach a goal that ends up being moot, like watching a rated R movie on TV for the violence. "Pointless" still fits the bill, but I think there was another word I was trying to use.