LMAO, But Seriously, That 100 Hours On Faces Had To be True..... Right????

[Billz313]

Cause its the only thing in that video that looks close to good lol. You can really tell that a bunch of time was put into faces lmao.

I REALLY think this comment is being under attended to, cause from the looks of things, its true. The faces look great, while nothing else looks anywhere close to bad, everything else is worse than bad and thats saying something.

When EA said that ****, we shoulda paid attention cause its actually defining the game. We talk about the 2 years of dev time they had, but we ignore the comment about 100 hours being done on faces. EA actually thought that would be an area they could compete in, and they dedicated great time to the faces, leading to what we have now, a horrible demonstration of basketball with good looking faces.

I mean, like seriously, that comment is 100% true. I seriously think that EA was planning on using the faces as one of their main promo tools and it shows. What do you dudes think????? I noticed that this comment did not get enough attention so I had to bring it up, cause its VERY relevent to the production of this game. They literally put 100 hours into the faces, and then complained about having a short dev cycle. LMAO, pleeeeeeeeease let this thread ride out mods, cause its a serious topic, I just cant stop laughing at the fact that they were serious about it.

So thanks in advance if yall keep it open ok..........

[Amedu]

I agree with you the detail on player's faces were much more better than 2k in my opinion.. you can tell they put a lot of detail in making realistic player faces

[Billz313]

Quote: Originally Posted by Amedu

I agree with you the detail on player's faces were much more better than 2k in my opinion.. you can tell they put a lot of detail in making realistic player faces

No, I never said they looked better than 2k's, they are not even close in any way, shape, or form. I was just stating that Lives faces were the only thing that looked solid, for them to have dedicated 100 hours to faces shows, cause the rest of the game aint ****. I mean, why the fukk would anybody/company in their right mind think that it was OK to spend 100 hours on some shyt that has nothing at all to do with gameplay. EA needs to cancel Live for good, **** it, lets get 989 Sports back in here to make another NBA Shootout lol, im sure they can do better than that garbage EA is about to release.

[barimanlhs]

To be fair to the Live dev team, the people working on graphics arent the same people working on gameplay. Although its a surprise that the whole body isnt as detailed as the faces....you would think its a package deal lol

Graphics have never been a major issue for Live, its the gameplay that has the core issues (Live 10 aside)

[MielVB]

For the stars, wasn't it 100 hours for EACH face? Thought I heard a developer say that in an E3 interview... Either way, it's crazy to put this stuff before gameplay in development...

[Gman 18]

The only thing good about this game are the graphics.

[HoosierDaddy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gman 18

The only thing good about this game are the graphics.

That's not true. Presentation is great. I think Presentation is the best thing about this game. Graphics still are off to me, but I don't care about any of that until the gameplay/physics/mechanics are fixed. Foundation people.

[P-Dub]

Unless they utilize some of that time for making proper face expressions and emotions coupled with matching body language, the faces will only look good in screenshots. Having great looking models and textures is fine, but you need to add the animation to show how much that work can shine.