Oh..another thing came to mind. Don't be a slave to overall ratings...for teams or players.
For example, you will see many fullbacks with a 99 rating. Why? Because to get them to act more realistically as fullbacks you have to raise their blocking ratings, awareness at a minimum so they pick up blocks and lead the way for the halfback. These specific ratings really raise the overall for the player.
QBs may seem a little lower than what you are used to seeing. This is to avoid robo QB as well as lead to more realistic passing percentages. I did look at pro-football-reference.com to see who were the best long passers and made sure their Deep Pass rating was in the mid 80's to 90 or so. You won't see 99s for many ratings, but there are a few that have certain traits rated between 95-98.
I think the lower ratings leads to better, more realistic looking in field play. Remember, this is a roster with the best of the best. You won't see many players rated low, because they would not deserve to be in an All-time roster if so!
It's fun to dream and create this type of roster, but you do sort of have to suspend disbelief when playing it watching.
Have fun!
Oh..I didn't do the Texans. Ran out of gas and don't care about them anyway.

. It's the only team I didn't do.
Sent from my IN2019 using Tapatalk