Home
Madden NFL 11 News Post

Check out the screenshot comparison of Philip Rivers in Madden NFL 11 and Madden NFL 10. Huge upgrade? Slight upgrade? What are your thoughts?

Madden NFL 11 screenshot gallery - Click to view
Game: Madden NFL 11Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 96 - View All
Madden NFL 11 Videos
Member Comments
# 41 TheWatcher @ 03/28/10 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyfat9
Looks good but how often does one play a close up game to see the details in the face.
If they used camera's that were like TV where they show the QB just under shoulder (many times after an incomplete pass, for example), then this would be great. My gripe (in addition to the other issues I mentioned earlier) is that the camera's don't behave like a broadcast, and therefore angles like this one never happen during the game, which makes these pictures frustrating to look at. It's more like looking at a demonstration, because you know these will never wind up in the game.

I was watching some video of Madden 02 for PS2 and was surprised to find that the way the camera's behaved in terms of shot selection was a lot closer to broadcast than what we've had all generation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZZsOudP2i4

Aside from great stuff like intro's with name banners and sideline reports, or scenes of the coaches reacting intelligently to what's happening on the field... look at 8:24 of the video where Sehorn knocks down a pass from Grbac. Look at the post-play reaction from Sehorn. It's much smoother than anything we get now. The post-play player reactions today are terrible. And look at the camera shot on Sehorn, it's done well. But then they went a step further and they showed Grbac in the huddle trying to collect himself and the camera shot was nice.

... the fact that it all moved so smoothly is what I like most about it. None of this moves smoothly in Madden today, the camera's aren't right, the shot selection is almost never right. It doesn't flow like a broadcast at all.

Shots like these would make detail matter more and I'd have a lot more enthusiasm about the pictures they're releasing. But it's hard to get enthused about something I'm never going to see while playing the game live as a result of the camera's not being right.

The last two years they've been working on broadcast elements, and there was improvement last season. But at some point, they've got to nail this thing with the camera's. Above all the other presentation elements, this one thing with how camera's operate and how scenes chain together is paramount.
 
# 42 Bgamer90 @ 03/28/10 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tye_803
LOOK AT THE NCAA 11 SCREENSHOTS ! That looks like Play Station 5 graphics compared to this madden 11 screenshots. ...Its ridiculous.
Yeah that statement really was ridiculous.

Anyways, the graphics are perfectly fine.

Heck, I would be happy with Madden 10 graphics for the rest of this gen if by keeping them the same, things such as progressive lighting, better field degradation, and interactive sidelines are added.
 
# 43 SageInfinite @ 03/28/10 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWatcher
If they used camera's that were like TV where they show the QB just under shoulder (many times after an incomplete pass, for example), then this would be great. My gripe (in addition to the other issues I mentioned earlier) is that the camera's don't behave like a broadcast, and therefore angles like this one never happen during the game, which makes these pictures frustrating to look at. It's more like looking at a demonstration, because you know these will never wind up in the game.

I was watching some video of Madden 02 for PS2 and was surprised to find that the way the camera's behaved in terms of shot selection was a lot closer to broadcast than what we've had all generation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZZsOudP2i4

Aside from great stuff like intro's with name banners and sideline reports, or scenes of the coaches reacting intelligently to what's happening on the field... look at 8:24 of the video where Sehorn knocks down a pass from Grbac. Look at the post-play reaction from Sehorn. It's much smoother than anything we get now. The post-play player reactions today are terrible. And look at the camera shot on Sehorn, it's done well. But then they went a step further and they showed Grbac in the huddle trying to collect himself and the camera shot was nice.

... the fact that it all moved so smoothly is what I like most about it. None of this moves smoothly in Madden today, the camera's aren't right, the shot selection is almost never right. It doesn't flow like a broadcast at all.

Shots like these would make detail matter more and I'd have a lot more enthusiasm about the pictures they're releasing. But it's hard to get enthused about something I'm never going to see while playing the game live as a result of the camera's not being right.

The last two years they've been working on broadcast elements, and there was improvement last season. But at some point, they've got to nail this thing with the camera's. Above all the other presentation elements, this one thing with how camera's operate and how scenes chain together is paramount.
Exactly. Madden 2001 I think was some of EA's best post play camera work. The game was always on display when PS2 was just being released and it wow'd alot of people off of the camera's alone.

I went into replay mode and captured what I think some of the post play shots should look like. They would definitely help the wow factor since the graphics are so good up close. Forgive the cellphone quality.




Add in some long post play animations and this game could go alot further convincing people it is a real broadcast.
 
# 44 Bgamer90 @ 03/28/10 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tye_803
blah blah blah...kill yourself.
lol what?
Quote:
its going on the 6th Madden on nex-gen systems and if they cnt make the game look alot better and inhance the gameplay then that just goes to show that this "new madden team" arent workin as hard as they say they are. maybe ur standards for the madden game arent as high but by the 6th madden game on nex-gen systems they should have this game down pact especially when its the only NFL football game out...no questions asked.
To save you from being disappointed, the game isn't going to look a whole lot better than how it looks now for more than likely here on out the rest of this gen.
 
# 45 Bgamer90 @ 03/28/10 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageInfinite



Add in some long post play animations and this game could go alot further convincing people it is a real broadcast.
Man that looks real good.

But yeah, I agree.

There needs to be more real time cuts during post-play up close like how it was in Madden 2001/2002. It would put procedural awareness/player emotions, and the new depth of field to good use.
 
# 46 Bgamer90 @ 03/28/10 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tye_803
yeah thats what they said last year.
Yep and they stated things that were added that were more than just minor graphical improvements later on in the year.

So yeah... don't really see what you are trying to get at.
 
# 47 PacMan3000 @ 03/28/10 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageInfinite
Exactly. Madden 2001 I think was some of EA's best post play camera work. The game was always on display when PS2 was just being released and it wow'd alot of people off of the camera's alone.

I went into replay mode and captured what I think some of the post play shots should look like. They would definitely help the wow factor since the graphics are so good up close. Forgive the cellphone quality.




Add in some long post play animations and this game could go alot further convincing people it is a real broadcast.
This is brilliant. It's exactly what I want to see and can only hope Ian is lurking here somewhere.
 
# 48 Joborule @ 03/28/10 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageInfinite



Add in some long post play animations and this game could go alot further convincing people it is a real broadcast.
This post right here just show how far camera works goes in making presentation and graphics look good.
 
# 49 NY_Giants @ 03/28/10 06:50 PM
Funny how you tinted those pictures orange like the NCAA pictures. lol. I agree NCAA11 looks great. if the NCAA pictures are in a magazine I would think they are real. this rivers screenshot....not so much.
 
# 50 TheWatcher @ 03/28/10 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageInfinite
Exactly. Madden 2001 I think was some of EA's best post play camera work. The game was always on display when PS2 was just being released and it wow'd alot of people off of the camera's alone.

I went into replay mode and captured what I think some of the post play shots should look like. They would definitely help the wow factor since the graphics are so good up close. Forgive the cellphone quality.




Add in some long post play animations and this game could go alot further convincing people it is a real broadcast.
Yep. This is it. Very nice shots.

If they could do that and have new post-play player reactions like you pointed out (and I hate to say this again but the reactions/movements are terrible right now), then this very big missing piece would finally come together. They just can't save the post-play animations in the game now. They're just bad, they have to be scrapped, new animations must be made. I mean, after 5 seasons I don't see why we have the same post-play reactions anyway. Advancements should've been happening here every season.

The post-play animations need to be more intelligent and tied to situations, because the last thing I'd want to see is a great camera shot of a player celebrating a 1-yard loss like we sometimes get now (minus the great shot of course). I'd also like to see celebrating tied to a rating (even a hidden one will do), because seeing players who never go nuts in real life do it in Madden is just another one of those things that affects authenticity in a negative way.
 
# 51 SageInfinite @ 03/28/10 07:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule
This post right here just show how far camera works goes in making presentation and graphics look good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacMan3000
This is brilliant. It's exactly what I want to see and can only hope Ian is lurking here somewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWatcher
Yep. This is it. Very nice shots.

If they could do that and have new post-play player reactions like you pointed out (and I hate to say this again but the reactions/movements are terrible right now), then this very big missing piece would finally come together. They just can't save the post-play animations in the game now. They're just bad, they have to be scrapped, new animations must be made. I mean, after 5 seasons I don't see why we have the same post-play reactions anyway. Advancements should've been happening here every season.

The post-play animations need to be more intelligent and tied to situations, because the last thing I'd want to see is a great camera shot of a player celebrating a 1-yard loss like we sometimes get now (minus the great shot of course). I'd also like to see celebrating tied to a rating (even a hidden one will do), because seeing players who never go nuts in real life do it in Madden is just another one of those things that affects authenticity in a negative way.
I really hope Tiburon sees these posts.
 
# 52 RGiles36 @ 03/28/10 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWatcher
If they could do that and have new post-play player reactions like you pointed out (and I hate to say this again but the reactions/movements are terrible right now), then this very big missing piece would finally come together. They just can't save the post-play animations in the game now. They're just bad, they have to be scrapped, new animations must be made. I mean, after 5 seasons I don't see why we have the same post-play reactions anyway. Advancements should've been happening here every season.
I'm not holding my breath on better pre/post actions. Tiburon seems to look past this area (and maybe justifiably so as most gamers could probably care less).

But to think the QB would still be sprinting to the LOS if we didn't speak up a year ago, and it's kind of discouraging to think we'll see improvement here.

Equally discouraging is to think about how there was emphasis on presentation last year, and there's still so much left to be desired. I'm hoping M10's presentation was a byproduct of having to address so many other areas and not being able to place major emphasis on the broadcast element. But I hate that I have to press pause to see some of the pertinent stat information.
 
# 53 videlsports @ 03/28/10 10:30 PM
It looks cool, but I don't play the game that way. I appericiate the effort though. I think NCAA will be better.
 
# 54 phant030 @ 03/29/10 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ2320
The graphics in Madden 11 "LOOK" good, but how is the "GAMEPLAY"?
How would anyone know?...smh
 
# 55 ak47jared @ 03/30/10 04:10 PM
slight upgrade mainly in colors; innoticable without cut scenes.

madden did a terrible job on rookies in madden 10, i ll be interested to see rookies this year.
 
# 56 BezO @ 03/30/10 04:23 PM
Not sure what's considered art, but I wish this effort would have gone into sidelines & crowds. The players already looked great.

But I'm with the folks that say leave the graphics alone. I know, I know, different folks work on different aspects of the game. Well, reassign the art folks to gameplay and KIM.
 
# 57 phant030 @ 03/30/10 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ2320
I think the game testers would know. What do you think?...smh
And how is that relevant in a screenshot comparison? smh
 
# 58 av7 @ 03/31/10 01:44 AM
Back on topic, please.
 
# 59 Only1LT @ 03/31/10 01:45 PM
The 11 screenshot obviously looks better. Great strides on the textures in 11 with respect to the jersey. Looks much more like fabric in 11. Skin looks more realistic as well.

Just a guess, but I would say that the polygon count for the player models has been upped as well.

All of this is fine and well, but for me, where Madden's graphics are most lacking is with the player models themselves. This has been a weakness, not just of Madden, but of most EA Sports games, for as long as they have been making them. Doesn't matter if the team changes either, the player models have always been too skinny and had heads that were a little too large. Marionette limbs as well.

When they address that, then we will have something. Until then, no matter how much tweaking they do, the players will just look like photo-realistic caricatures.
 
# 60 Only1LT @ 03/31/10 01:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xNYGx
I'm not reading all the posts, but I've already seen a few complaints about QB's looking thinner than they should. If they paid attention in the past, they'd know why QB's don't quite look right in Madden.

I suppose most people aren't aware that Flak-Jackets haven't been in Madden on Next-Gen. Some may not even know what a Flak-Jacket is. For those unaware, "Flak-Jackets" are a piece of equipment most QB's in the league wear to protect themselves from the blows they take. The padding is a bit above the waist, and gives the QB a "bigger" look.

So stop complaining about the size of the players. The QB's would look fine if they had the Flak-Jackets in the game. I believe it's something they're looking to get into this years game, since they didn't have time to get it in last years.

Flak-Jacket:


Flak-Jacket in NCAA Football:


Big Ben IRL:


Big Ben in Madden:

Madden's player model issues have absolutely nothing to do with a lack of a flak jacket. The player models across the board are off and always have been.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.