Judge Score Cards Are Flawed of Biases

[minelevation]

I am at odds with this game the scoring system is biases or flawed in the way they score the fight.... Look at the fight totals for this one we both knocked each other down in the same round that i was dominating... Pictures for explanation.. For the record i do not run i keep enough distance for me to Jab and counter i use circular ring movement to avoid stamina at the end of fight my stamina was around 54 percent . i will also post other fight totals from other fights i will also post round by round photos from this fight

[minelevation]

this is how all of my fights are as far as counters and everything else

[minelevation]

Also they give the advantage in World championship to the fighter with the higher overall my boxer is an 80 he was an 83 i was an undderdog going into this fight

[EarvGotti]

LOL dude all you threw was jabs and straights. No wonder you lost. Jabs dont do much damage. Whoever does the most damage wins the fight.

[minelevation]

Quote: Originally Posted by EarvGotti

LOL dude all you threw was jabs and straights. No wonder you lost. Jabs dont do much damage. Whoever does the most damage wins the fight.

Look at his body damage compared to mind are you blind.. Clearly i did the most damage Jabs do a consideral amount of damage over time. Can someone who think they know a little bit about boxing comment thanks

[phillyfan23]

I agree with the decision.....

Not only were most of your punches jabs (straights can do damage), you didn't connect on ONE power punch.

The opponent landed significantly less punches than you, but most of his shots were SIGNIFICANT and he landed a good deal of power punches.

However, i do agree that the judging is in fact flawed....

I understand the premise of judging on significant strikes, but the game thinks that a straight is much less significant than hooks and uppercuts. Those punches should count the same as far as points/significance are concerned. Jabs are the only punch that should count less in this regard.

For example.....what happens if you're Lennox fighting Tyson.....

Lewis' strategy should keep the distance and land jabs and straights with occasional hooks and uppercuts. (how he defeated Tyson)

Tyson should try to keep the fight inside and go for hooks and uppercuts

in one round for example, throwing the same amount of punches.....Lewis lands 15 jabs and 10 straights, and Tyson lands 6 jabs, 1 hooks and 7 uppercuts.

If I were judging, I'd give the round to lewis, but this game will give the round to tyson because uppercuts and hooks are valued much more than straights.

jabs fine, their value should be less, but the straights shouldn't be.....this system will put the outside fighters at a disadvantage forcing them to fight INSIDE and lose their natural physical advantages and force them MOST times to use their money punches LESS ( the straight/cross)....think Wlad Klitchsko, think Lennox, think ALI....the jab straight combination he had was a huuuuuge weapon.

[minelevation]

Do you guys not see the counter punches, body punches, I out did him in every category except power.. What stats are you guys looking at ?? How is he more effective ?

[EarvGotti]

Dude, out of your 800 punches about 300 of them were jabs. He landed a variety of punches which have more power than jabs. He landed more power punches. He did more damage in comparison to the type of punches he threw.