EA SPORTS FC25 OS Community Sliders

[smmowolf88]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

It wasn't too bad tbh. First time playing in PL as well for me as I usually play lower league: WC, 10 mins, Sprint 35/50 (User) 35/55 (CPU) - Custom 50's Also played Legendary for the away match to [beloved] Fulham: Leg, 10 mins, Sprint 35/50 (User and CPU), tested shot error 72/72, forgot to change Leg marking to 50/50 - Custom 50's Overall, no complaints from me. I like how the CPU changes the pace despite it being on custom 50's. A lot of variety from their passing. Just variety in general with how the ball moves and reacts. I like how the central midfielders keep the shape and it forces the both User and CPU to make alternate decisions than just pass forward-forward constantly. I enjoy seeing the CPU not be able to use the driven pass forward as well, and instead use it to the side like the user does. I struggle with player switching at times and it definitely cost me on some goals conceded. I think the CPU did too in my tying goal vs Fulham - so it balances out. I'd be really curious what accel 50/55 on Legendary would look like.

Matt or anyone else on here know the camera settings I.e zoom height and far side focus? I know it's on broadcast just wandering if anyone knew the exact settings?

[ZILER]

2 videos on the same matches to see the difference. Low level team just.
The FT is at 91/95
The first in 35/50 and 35/52 for the cpu.

https://youtu.be/Xb18OmyqBlk?si=9iKuR0E7Imy4gBNX

The second 35/52 to the CPU 35/55.
FT 91/95.
https://youtu.be/024JVp4OxbI?si=WaTJIVMOuF9Ffbp7

I prefer the 35/52 and 35/55. It’s more equitable otherwise the cpu has too much lead. And endurance gets more tired for the cpu.

[Mister MikTo]

Here are some more matches with Beta 6. I really enjoyed SPRINT/ACC 35-35/50-55. The discrepancy between user and cpu on WC makes for a nice challenge. I think it's necessary to play like this in the lower leagues. In the top leagues, like the Bundesliga, SPRINT/ACC 35/55 can also be good.

7. OS Sliders Testing V5 Beta 6 - PS5, WC Fuse 10 minutes (Custom 50 - Sprint/Acc 40/52)
https://youtu.be/UrYaEqUf9hQ


8. OS Sliders Testing V5 Beta 6 - PS5, WC Fuse 10 minutes (Custom 50 - Sprint/Acc 35/55)
https://youtu.be/heEP36enMjM


9. OS Sliders Testing V5 Beta 6 - PS5, WC Fuse 10 minutes (Custom 50 - Sprint/Acc 35- 35 / 50-55)
https://youtu.be/7zExgGLS2ik


10. OS Sliders Testing V5 Beta 6 - PS5, WC Fuse 10 minutes (Custom 50 - Sprint/Acc 35-35/50-55)
https://youtu.be/zFt0okh4lpA

[hecbel]

Quote: Originally Posted by smmowolf88

Matt or anyone else on here know the camera settings I.e zoom height and far side focus? I know it's on broadcast just wandering if anyone knew the exact settings?

Hi. Yes, this is broadcast. But, to be fair, it doesn't matter exactly how you adjust it.

Every stadium has its own particular camera angle. You can check it by yourself playing with:
0 height (this is the main differential value)
0 zoom
0 far side focus
0 zoom on goal

Then play in these stadiums:
London Stadium (West Ham)
Vitality Stadium (Bournemouth)
Craven Cottage (Fulham)

You will notice a big difference on the first look.The main rule is that the new stadiums updated by EA have more diversity of angles (like the 3 Portuguese stadiums, the Spanish ones like Mallorca or Almeria, and the Luton Town stadium, which I love), and the older stadiums in the game and the default stadiums have a similar camera with fewer differences.

In my personal opinion, play Zoom 0, then 0 for the rest. Adjust the height to 20 if the stadium view is too low (like Vitality Stadium).

This particular view also affects cameras like EA Gamecam, Tactical, and Tele Broadcast views.

[Jushin]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

I agree that sliders can only do so much. The low-block teams are what I test the most though. As I mentioned on the previous page, I have a Serie B CM with AS Bari and have yet to win a game. I also have a CM with Exeter City and am sitting not so pretty in 15th through 10 matches. I think there is more of an importance to set up a discrepancy when playing weaker teams, whether that be Sprint or Acc, or both. Currently, I am testing 35/55 for the CPU, and as the user I'm at 35/50 - makes for some pretty tough matches. Also trying 35/50 user vs 40/50 for CPU.

I'll try giving them 55 acc next game... But I don't find the overall difficulty to necessarily be the issue. Just their lack of desire to defend.

For whatever reason, I find they just aren't interested. I can walk towards their box without any pressure until I reach it a lot of the time.

It could even be the users choice of tactics, perhaps the AI is responding weirdly to certain tactics, where they would respond differently to others.

[hecbel]

Version 5 Beta 6, World Class, 10min, FUMA, Custom 50 tactic, 35/35 - 50/55



I loved the game, but it made me realize some things:
1 - I had a bug with enhanced graphics (in the first half, you can see at the top of the field the grass changing colors when the ads change). In the second half, I change to resolution mode and disappear.

2 - IA was aggressive. That's good, but with the Referee Strictness in "Default" IA ended with 9 players. That's not good. I changed Referee Strictness to "Lenient"

3 - Acceleration discrepancy didn't mean that my players wouldn't be able to win races against slower CPU players. I loved that.

4 - GK animations are really nice. I have to play more games to see if there are some weird saves going on, but in my very small sample, I love them.

[Vanuatu96]

Quote: Originally Posted by Vanuatu96

Hello! Been following and testing this SS/Acc. binomial, from the 35/50 one to the 40/55 threshold. Would like to know what you think about 35/50 for User paired with a 40/55 for the CPU. Would that lead to an even bigger challenge, or would it kinda break that animation threshold and actually end up working the other way around? Appreciate your opinions/experiences on that one. Thank you! Keep it up!

Has anyone tested it?

Would appreciate an answer.

Thank you!

[Jushin]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

I agree that sliders can only do so much. The low-block teams are what I test the most though. As I mentioned on the previous page, I have a Serie B CM with AS Bari and have yet to win a game. I also have a CM with Exeter City and am sitting not so pretty in 15th through 10 matches. I think there is more of an importance to set up a discrepancy when playing weaker teams, whether that be Sprint or Acc, or both. Currently, I am testing 35/55 for the CPU, and as the user I'm at 35/50 - makes for some pretty tough matches. Also trying 35/50 user vs 40/50 for CPU.

This is an example of the defensive engagement issues i'm seeing every time.

The CPU just refuse to attempt to stop me. Why am i allowed to walk from half way to their box without anyone trying to stop me.

Ignore the worst shot ever!!

Every game is this - i can just walk into position or play easy passes into space.

This was with the 35/50 .. 35/55 settings. The additional acc they have is making the game tougher, but not in the right way. It's just making defending harder and score lines too silly.

i wonder if a reduction in width might help.