More Links

beamon05 · 05-11-2010, 01:13 AM

Include the Mariners too.

Which of these four would make for a more fun franchise? I like all 4 teams, as well as their uniforms. Stadiums aren't a big deal. I know the White Sox and Mariners have the best pitching, the Indians the best offense, and the A's are probably the biggest challenge. But if forced to choose, which of these four do you guys think would be most fun to play 162 games with?

jdmsi7 · 05-11-2010, 11:05 AM

I'd day Seattle but that's coming from a griffey fan lol. They all sound fun tho.

texbuk84 · 05-11-2010, 11:15 AM

I'm ah A's fan and we have alot of young pitching talent!!

Reaman · 05-11-2010, 05:40 PM

Athletics

jkeefeholmes · 05-11-2010, 07:46 PM

Lifelong A's fan, but depending on your idea of 'fun' you might watn to pick somebody else. Though Oak is doing fairly decent in real life--so far. But I play for them as starting first basemen in RTTS (they made Daric Barton DH, I'm THAT GOOD LOL) and they are miserable! Mid august and we have won like 40 games Though we lead the league in team BA, our pitching is pathetic.

I wish I could be rtts AND GM and get some trades going etc. At end of my rookie season, I may try to defect to a team that knows how to win. Not sure I will have any choice, and might want to stick it out anyway. Would be hard to leave Oakland, but it gets depressing losing so much.

RTTS is kind of a joke in some ways anyway. CPU teams bunting all the time, Paul Konerko, ARod, Vernon Wells etc etc. And not only bunting, but with two outs, nobody on, sometime 2 strikes. And mosy the time they succeed becasue the rtts fielding is bad. They get the ball and take forever to throw it to me. Do a little dance first, have a sandwich, whatever. Anyway I digress, RTTS is fun, but is is lacking in major ways.

Dont even get me started on RTTS base running. Its horrendous.

SethMurphy · 05-11-2010, 08:55 PM

i voted Indians... I like Hagadone and Carrasco along with the young offensive prospects and future with Cabrera, LaPorta, Santana and Marson.. plus having two A-potential catchers gives you a lot of trade bait.

Pielet · 05-11-2010, 09:21 PM

Chicago would be a little tough offensively, but they have a little of everything. Pitching is nice, bullpen is a little weak.

cavhokie017899 · 05-12-2010, 01:05 AM

I think Oakland would be fun. Good pitching, manufacture some runs and try and re-create the success of the 1970's and 80's!!

View Poll Results: Which One?
White Sox	13	30.23%
Athletics	16	37.21%
Indians	14	32.56%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

05-11-2010, 01:13 AM	#1
beamon05 Banned OVR: 1 Join Date: Feb 2010	White Sox, A's, or Indians? Include the Mariners too. Which of these four would make for a more fun franchise? I like all 4 teams, as well as their uniforms. Stadiums aren't a big deal. I know the White Sox and Mariners have the best pitching, the Indians the best offense, and the A's are probably the biggest challenge. But if forced to choose, which of these four do you guys think would be most fun to play 162 games with? Last edited by beamon05; 05-11-2010 at 01:50 AM. Reason: Forgot the Mariners

05-11-2010, 11:05 AM	#2
jdmsi7 Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jun 2009	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? I'd day Seattle but that's coming from a griffey fan lol. They all sound fun tho.

05-11-2010, 11:15 AM	#3
texbuk84 Mercy Extended. John 3:16 OVR: 34 Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: new jersey Posts: 1,279 Blog Entries: 9	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? I'm ah A's fan and we have alot of young pitching talent!! __________________ Oakland Athletics/Phillies Celtics FAN/ Jazz supporter Eagles[/color] Devils 2kflightschool.webs.com

05-11-2010, 05:40 PM	#4
Reaman MVP OVR: 42 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,918 Blog Entries: 63	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? Athletics

	New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
	The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
	Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival

05-11-2010, 07:46 PM	#5
jkeefeholmes Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 378	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? Lifelong A's fan, but depending on your idea of 'fun' you might watn to pick somebody else. Though Oak is doing fairly decent in real life--so far. But I play for them as starting first basemen in RTTS (they made Daric Barton DH, I'm THAT GOOD LOL) and they are miserable! Mid august and we have won like 40 games Though we lead the league in team BA, our pitching is pathetic. I wish I could be rtts AND GM and get some trades going etc. At end of my rookie season, I may try to defect to a team that knows how to win. Not sure I will have any choice, and might want to stick it out anyway. Would be hard to leave Oakland, but it gets depressing losing so much. RTTS is kind of a joke in some ways anyway. CPU teams bunting all the time, Paul Konerko, ARod, Vernon Wells etc etc. And not only bunting, but with two outs, nobody on, sometime 2 strikes. And mosy the time they succeed becasue the rtts fielding is bad. They get the ball and take forever to throw it to me. Do a little dance first, have a sandwich, whatever. Anyway I digress, RTTS is fun, but is is lacking in major ways. Dont even get me started on RTTS base running. Its horrendous.

05-11-2010, 08:55 PM	#6
SethMurphy Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Centerville, PA	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? i voted Indians... I like Hagadone and Carrasco along with the young offensive prospects and future with Cabrera, LaPorta, Santana and Marson.. plus having two A-potential catchers gives you a lot of trade bait.

05-11-2010, 09:21 PM	#7
Pielet Pro OVR: 12 Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 768	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? Chicago would be a little tough offensively, but they have a little of everything. Pitching is nice, bullpen is a little weak.

05-12-2010, 01:05 AM	#8
cavhokie017899 Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Apr 2010	Re: White Sox, A's, or Indians? I think Oakland would be fun. Good pitching, manufacture some runs and try and re-create the success of the 1970's and 80's!!

More Links

White Sox, A's, or Indians?