Home
MLB The Show 16 News Post


The developer team has revealed the top MLB The Show 16 player ratings at each position. Check them out here.

Below are the top players in the game.
  • Mike Trout - 99 Overall
  • Clayton Kershaw - 99 Overall
  • Bryce Harper - 97 Overall
  • Josh Donaldson - 96 Overall
  • Miguel Cabrera - 96 Overall
  • Paul Goldschmidt - 96 Overall
  • Max Scherzer - 95 Overall
  • Jake Arrieta -95 Overall
  • Zack Greinke - 95 Overall
  • Manny Machado - 94 Overall
  • David Price - 94 Overall
  • Chris Sale - 94 Overall
  • Jose Altuve - 94 Overall
  • Matt Harvey - 94 Overall
  • Joey Votto - 94 Overall
  • Andrew McCutchen - 94 Overall
  • Buster Posey - 94 Overall
  • Wade Davis - 93 Overall
  • Felix Hernandez - 93 Overall
  • Jose Fernandez - 93 Overall
  • Giancarlo Stanton - 93 Overall
  • Jacob deGrom - 93 Overall
  • Nolan Arenado - 93 Overall
  • Kenley Jansen - 93 Overall
  • Madison Bumgarner - 93 Overall
  • Craig Kimbrel - 93 Overall
  • Troy Tulowitzki - 93 Overall

Game: MLB The Show 16Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4Votes for game: 23 - View All
MLB The Show 16 Videos
Member Comments
# 161 Jason27 @ 03/17/16 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyBruin12
I think the main reason why Bogaerts is so low is that has no power at all but I hope they gave him some decent fielding because they under rated it last year.
Agreed! And hopefully they fixed Jackie Bradley Jr.'s arm strength & throwing accuracy as well.
 
# 162 Cavicchi @ 03/17/16 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by p00p1
I put more stock in the career stats than 1 article about the 2013 season. His rating is based of career performance, not picking and choosing his best year
Perez did not have a full season until 2013. Picking and choosing? 2013 and 2014 is picking and choosing--the first two full seasons in the majors for Perez.

Of course you don't want to look at 2013 and 2014 and see how Perez blocked pitches better than Posey. I can well understand that.

Have a nice day!
 
# 163 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/18/16 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by p00p1
There is a stat for it, I pointed it out a few days ago and he wanted to keep arguing that he doesn't believe in wild pitch stats and wants to judge based on Gold Gloves (even though they are in different leagues).

Fangraphs has RPP – The number of runs above / below average a catcher is at blocking pitches.

.
I'm not all that crazy for RPP either since it takes into account passed balls & I feel PB's should be used in calculating catcher Fielding. But at least it's a positive step in the right direction.


EDIT After more deliberation on the matter the best way to determine a catchers block rating is if blocked pitches were kept as a stat. Then you would calculate BP/WP (Blocked pitches divided by wild pitches).
 
# 164 p00p1 @ 03/18/16 05:27 PM
To be fair, I looked at some ratings last night and saw that Russell Martin had a decent blocking stat, but he is among the worst in RPP.
 
# 165 underdog13 @ 03/19/16 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjhj
agreed on Bryant and Schwarber being underrated... Sad thing!
Lol Bryant is what 85 already and why should Schwarber be a top ten lf?

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk
 
# 166 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/19/16 10:53 AM
85 is plenty high enough for Bryant's debut on a default roster. The man's game has plenty room to grow. If he hits over .300 with 30 homers & gets his WAR up to 7 or 8 then bump him into the 90 range. IMO
 
# 167 MetsFan16 @ 03/19/16 01:00 PM
Curious to see how these Flashback cards get rated. Will Prime cards be rated based on that Prime year or will it still be 3 previous years.
 
# 168 bamawaz @ 03/25/16 07:05 AM
I like seeing this every year before game comes out. Mostly agree with the ratings.
 
# 169 Denzel Washington @ 03/25/16 07:44 PM
I hope we can all agree that the way defensive ratings are handled is backwards. There's no reason Lindor shouldn't have better defense than tulowitzki
 
# 170 p00p1 @ 03/25/16 08:00 PM
Lindor's fielding% was .974, Tulo has only had 1 season where it was lower than that and only 2 seasons where he's made as many errors (10) as Lindor did. He also has 2 Gold Gloves, you should find a different SS to compare.
 
# 171 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/25/16 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by p00p1
Lindor's fielding% was .974, Tulo has only had 1 season where it was lower than that and only 2 seasons where he's made as many errors (10) as Lindor did. He also has 2 Gold Gloves, you should find a different SS to compare.
Tulo's GG seasons won't be reflected in Show 16. And you can dismiss fielding % too, since that includes throwing errors.


EDIT I think a more likely explanation is Lindor's smaller sample size.
 
# 172 Denzel Washington @ 03/25/16 09:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by p00p1
Lindor's fielding% was .974, Tulo has only had 1 season where it was lower than that and only 2 seasons where he's made as many errors (10) as Lindor did. He also has 2 Gold Gloves, you should find a different SS to compare.
Derek Jeter won a lot of gold gloves too

Measuring defense by fielding percentage is so archaic. Terrible statistic that has no real bearing. Defense is not something that ages well period. Lindor is a better defender than Tulowitzki at this point in their respective careers and that really shouldnt be debatable,

He is the perfect SS to compare him to.
 
# 173 Denzel Washington @ 03/25/16 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Of The Year
Tulo's GG seasons won't be reflected in Show 16. And you can dismiss fielding % too, since that includes throwing errors.


EDIT I think a more likely explanation is Lindor's smaller sample size.
They can get input from scouting and maybe reach out to the MLB and gain some access to their data that's not widely available.

I wouldn't have as much of an issue if they updated defense in player updates but they hardly ever did that
 
# 174 Cavicchi @ 03/25/16 10:31 PM
Tulo's last 3 seasons defensively DWAR 1.2, 1.3, 1.2

Lindor in 2015 DWAR 1.7
 
# 175 Denzel Washington @ 03/25/16 10:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavicchi
Tulo's last 3 seasons defensively DWAR 1.2, 1.3, 1.2

Lindor in 2015 DWAR 1.7
The eye test will also tell you Lindor is a better defender. http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx...16&position=SS

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx...31&position=SS


Inside edge fielding
 
# 176 TattooedEvil @ 03/25/16 11:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denzel Washington
The eye test will also tell you Lindor is a better defender. http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx...16&position=SS

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx...31&position=SS


Inside edge fielding
ok I love Lindor and think he'll be better then Tulo but chill....Lindor has been in the league 5 minutes.
 
# 177 Denzel Washington @ 03/25/16 11:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TattooedEvil
ok I love Lindor and think he'll be better then Tulo but chill....Lindor has been in the league 5 minutes.
That's 100% irrelevant. Defense does not season or get better because you have been in the league for a long time. I'm not even asserting that Lindor is a better baseball player than tulowitzki or ever will be but 2016 Lindor is without a doubt a better defender than 2016 tulowitzki
 
# 178 TattooedEvil @ 03/26/16 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denzel Washington
That's 100% irrelevant. Defense does not season or get better because you have been in the league for a long time. I'm not even asserting that Lindor is a better baseball player than tulowitzki or ever will be but 2016 Lindor is without a doubt a better defender than 2016 tulowitzki
lmao very relevant. Defense can def season and get better cuz a players been in the league (as long as u work) for awhile. Crawford has gotten better year by year. The more into a players prime that player gets he works on his first step quickness and how to take better routes to the ball, how to get rid of it quicker, better footwork turning two, etc....You just dont have your skills when you get into the league and thats it. I am not defending Tulo one bit cuz I cant stand how he gets put on a pedastool for playing 100 games a year after breaking a nail, but one thing you hear from the older infielders (and by watching) is that Tulo and Crawford make a lot of very tough plays look very routine while some SSs make them look amazing.
 
# 179 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/26/16 08:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denzel Washington
....but 2015 Lindor was without a doubt a better defender than 2015 tulowitzki.
Fixxed.
When 2016 games get under way we'll most likley see more of the same, but I prefer not to assume unless forced to. lol
 
# 180 Denzel Washington @ 03/26/16 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TattooedEvil
lmao very relevant. Defense can def season and get better cuz a players been in the league (as long as u work) for awhile. Crawford has gotten better year by year. The more into a players prime that player gets he works on his first step quickness and how to take better routes to the ball, how to get rid of it quicker, better footwork turning two, etc....You just dont have your skills when you get into the league and thats it. I am not defending Tulo one bit cuz I cant stand how he gets put on a pedastool for playing 100 games a year after breaking a nail, but one thing you hear from the older infielders (and by watching) is that Tulo and Crawford make a lot of very tough plays look very routine while some SSs make them look amazing.
http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pri...s/aging-curve/

What aspect of lindor's defense would improve with age? Instincts are hardwired and young players are at their peak from a physical standpoint. Defense hardly ever improves. The few instances I can think of are from some tweaks to footwork but usually they aren't drastic changes and they are few and far between.

Regardless this is all pointless as lindor is better than tulowitzki defensively ATM. If you knew about lindor you knew that his glove has been ready in the minors for a few seasons and they were just letting his bat Get to the major league level.
Again, this isn't controversial once you look at the facts
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.